The world has come to a point where technology and cyberspace have become an in-thing amongst us. Scientists, thinkers and even bloggers depend on the vast, precise and concise information posted on the internet. Information from Wikipedia especially, give a clear-cut on various questionnaires. However, I do not wholly trust these information. For instance, Wikipedia administrator allows readers to edit information from articles posted by others. No matter what situation and how precise the information is, the thinking process among readers should be made the most of to make a strict stand of the conciseness of the information. There are various alternatives to minister such thinking process for example, educational books and trusted information-provider magazines which are far more reliable.

shashi kumar s/0 balasubramaniam
1091102536

2 comments:

Titanium said...

yes, i agree with you,shashi....Eventhough websites like Wikipedia are very useful for consumers, they have their cons as well...we are the one must be cautious in relying on websites like this...

THIVASSINI SUBRAMANIAM
1091101798

Titanium said...

you are right shashi.in order to not be cheated, we must really do some small research before trusting certain news.

VITHIYAH SANTARA SHEERAN
1091101410

Post a Comment